[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16574195#comment-16574195
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-2017:
-----------------------------------------

Github user jbertram commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2228#discussion_r208790685
  
    --- Diff: 
artemis-selector/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/selector/impl/SelectorParser.java
 ---
    @@ -80,11 +78,15 @@ public static BooleanExpression parse(String sql) 
throws FilterException {
                    StrictParser parser = new StrictParser(new 
StringReader(actual));
                    e = parser.JmsSelector();
                 }
    -            cache.put(sql, e);
    +            synchronized (cache) {
    --- End diff --
    
    My guess is that the LRUCache is there mainly because it was used in Apollo 
and basically the whole selector implementation from Apollo was ported over to 
the Artemis code-base during the Apache donation process.  It is a simple 
mitigation against excessive parsing, but perhaps it is premature optimization 
as well.  I don't see a big problem with pulling it out.  It would simplify the 
code-base a bit and eliminate the threading problem as well.  I certainly don't 
see any reason to invest resources into a more 
robust/elegant/higher-performance cache implementation.


> SelectorParser cache not thread-safe
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-2017
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2017
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.2
>            Reporter: Justin Bertram
>            Assignee: Justin Bertram
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.7.0, 2.6.3
>
>
> Concurrent usage of {{SelectorParser.parse()}} can cause the {{cache}} to 
> grow past its hard-coded size of 100.  Synchronizing {{put}} operations 
> eliminates this problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to