[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16628448#comment-16628448
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-2095:
-----------------------------------------

Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2328
  
    @michaelandrepearce I have done some experiments on it and I have noticed 
that the issue is the contention of the `state` field on `StampedLock` with the 
rest of the surrounding fields on the heap. Just using a `AtomicLongArray` of 
32 elements (256 bytes) and using the 16th element to hold the state is enough 
to avoid any weird contention issues with multi-sockets setup. 
    The effects of such change is so evident that just using a single-socket 
CPU would already benefit by this change. 
    The point is that it is an extreme way to improve perf on this and I don't 
know if we've such high contention of TypedProperties to justify it...


> TypedProperties thread safety
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-2095
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2095
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael Andre Pearce
>            Assignee: Michael Andre Pearce
>            Priority: Major
>
> Whilst TypedProperties is meant to have a single thread acting on it (and 
> this is the most typical interaction), there are occurrences where, it can be 
> acted on by other threads, when this occurs some concurrent modification 
> errors can occur.
> As such TypedProperties must be thread safe, but concurrency tuning should 
> factor in to be most performant for single thread.
>  
> e.g. 
> 2018-09-24 15:01:27,751 WARN 
> [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.message.impl.CoreMessage] Error creating 
> String for message: : java.util.ConcurrentModificationException at 
> java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextNode(HashMap.java:1437) [rt.jar:1.8.0_102] 
> at java.util.HashMap$EntryIterator.next(HashMap.java:1471) [rt.jar:1.8.0_102] 
> at java.util.HashMap$EntryIterator.next(HashMap.java:1469) [rt.jar:1.8.0_102] 
> at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.collections.TypedProperties.toString(TypedProperties.java:464)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to