[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16638408#comment-16638408
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-2110:
-----------------------------------------

GitHub user gtully opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2346

    ARTEMIS-2110 allow a lease renew without update to the expiry timesta…

    …mp. Fix intermittent failure of 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.jdbc.JdbcLeaseLockTest#shouldRenewAcquiredLock

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/gtully/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-2110

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2346.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2346
    
----
commit ddf0cac2d7531dc49484c283a7f4cbe44d8e278e
Author: gtully <gary.tully@...>
Date:   2018-10-04T15:47:16Z

    ARTEMIS-2110 allow a lease renew without update to the expiry timestamp. 
Fix intermittent failure of 
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.jdbc.JdbcLeaseLockTest#shouldRenewAcquiredLock

----


> JDBC LeaseLocker repeated renew or renew after aquire can fail in error
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-2110
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2110
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.3
>            Reporter: Gary Tully
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.7.0
>
>
> There is an intermittent failure in:
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.jdbc.JdbcLeaseLockTest#shouldRenewAcquiredLock
> (seems to block pr ci, and reproduced for me 20% of the time)
> if the db currentTime has not moved on, using the same lease time results in 
> a failure. A renew immediately after acquiring the lock is a sensible pattern 
> to verify the aquire. 
>  
> The lock renew needs >= in place or > on the WHERE clause to allow an 
> 'identity' lease to succeed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to