[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Tully updated AMQ-7081:
----------------------------
Attachment: AMQ7081Test.java
> After AMQ-7079 abortSlowAckConsumerStrategy aborts connection by default
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-7081
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7081
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Reporter: Simon Lundstrom
> Assignee: Gary Tully
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: AMQ7081Test.java
>
>
> The fix of AMQ-7079 introduced a breaking change bug since the default value
> of {{maxSlowCount=-1}} was longer enough for {{abortSlowAckConsumerStrategy}}
> to just configure the slow consumer detection but it started to disconnect
> the consumer as well.\{{}}
> Setting {{maxSlowDuration="-1"}} doesn't disconnect the consumer though but I
> don't think we should change the old default behavior.
> Pre AMQ-7079 fix:
> {code:xml}
> <abortSlowAckConsumerStrategy checkPeriod="1000" maxTimeSinceLastAck="3000"
> maxSlowCount="-1" />
> {code}
> worked before in just detecting a slow consumer. consumer was *not*
> disconnected.
> After AMQ-7079 fix:
> {code:xml}
> <abortSlowAckConsumerStrategy checkPeriod="1000" maxTimeSinceLastAck="3000"
> maxSlowCount="-1" />
> {code}
> disconnects the consumer; ActiveMQ logs:
> {code:java}
> 2018-10-19 10:42:33,124 | INFO | aborting slow consumer:
> ID:kaka.it.su.se-53364-1539938520009-1:1:1:1 for
> destination:queue://su.it.linfra.simlu |
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.policy.AbortSlowConsumerStrategy | ActiveMQ
> Broker[localhost] Scheduler
> 2018-10-19 10:42:50,250 | WARN | no matching consumer, ignoring ack null |
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection | ActiveMQ Transport:
> tcp:///127.0.0.1:53365@61616
> 2018-10-19 10:42:50,257 | WARN | Async error occurred:
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot remove a consumer that had not been
> registered: ID:kaka.it.su.se-53364-1539938520009-1:1:1:1 |
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Service | ActiveMQ Transport:
> tcp:///127.0.0.1:53365@61616
> {code}
> Spring Boot logs:
> {code:java}
> 2018-10-19 10:42:00.209 INFO 65846 --- [ main]
> se.su.it.simlu.esb.App : Started App in 1.849 seconds (JVM
> running for 2.386)
> 2018-10-19 10:42:33.129 WARN 65846 --- [0.1:61616@53365]
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession : Closed consumer on Command,
> ID:kaka.it.su.se-53364-1539938520009-1:1:1:1
> 2018-10-19 10:42:50.247 INFO 65846 --- [enerContainer-1]
> se.su.it.simlu.esb.Consumer : Message Received: Enter some text
> here for the message body...
> 2018-10-19 10:42:50.261 WARN 65846 --- [enerContainer-1]
> o.s.j.l.DefaultMessageListenerContainer : Setup of JMS message listener
> invoker failed for destination 'su.it.linfra.simlu' - trying to recover.
> Cause: The Consumer is closed
> 2018-10-19 10:42:50.300 INFO 65846 --- [enerContainer-1]
> o.s.j.l.DefaultMessageListenerContainer : Successfully refreshed JMS
> Connection
> {code}
>
> The order ("Consumer closed" before "Message Received") is weird because I
> just use a simple Thread.sleep I suspect:
> {code:java}
> @Transactional
> @JmsListener(destination = "su.it.linfra.simlu")
> public void receiveQueue(String text) throws Exception {
> Thread.sleep(50000);
> log.info("Message Received: "+text);
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
