[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16730814#comment-16730814
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-2214:
-----------------------------------------

Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2482
  
    Just looking over this a bit more. As the page ref needs to be a small as 
possible. The whole point of paging is to remove it from memory to be able to 
scale.
    
    With regards to priority i dont see this being accessed or affecting a hot 
path its only on access to message references. In regards to a consumer closing 
and having unhandled messages. This isnt on hot path imo, and shouldnt be 
tuning for that.


> Cache durable&priority in PagedReference to avoid blocks in consuming paged 
> messages
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-2214
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2214
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.3
>            Reporter: Qihong Xu
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: stacks.txt
>
>
> We recently performed a test on artemis broker and found a severe performance 
> issue.
> When paged messages are being consumed, decrementMetrics in 
> QueuePendingMessageMetrics will try to ‘getMessage’ to check whether they are 
> durable or not. In this way queue will be locked for a long time because page 
> may be GCed and need to be reload entirely. Other operations rely on queue 
> will be blocked at this time, which cause a significant TPS drop. Detailed 
> stacks are attached below.
> This also happens when consumer is closed and messages are pushed back to the 
> queue, artemis will check priority on return if these messages are paged.
> To solve the issue, durable and priority need to be cached in PagedReference 
> just like messageID, transactionID and so on. I have applied a patch to fix 
> the issue. Any review is appreciated.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to