[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2236?focusedWorklogId=188728&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-188728
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-2236:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 23/Jan/19 08:49
            Start Date: 23/Jan/19 08:49
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2514: 
ARTEMIS-2236 Address Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2514#issuecomment-456718199
 
 
   @franz1981 roughly correct
   
   The original one before 1451, tried to re-use an idle thread if possible 
before creating a new one, albiet using some sync blocks. 
   
   As the idea is its meant to be semantically like cachedthreadpool, but where 
there is simply a max bound to that cache, and then tasks should be queued
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 188728)
    Time Spent: 4h 50m  (was: 4h 40m)

> Address Latency Impact caused by ARTEMIS-1451
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-2236
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2236
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0, 2.5.0, 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Michael Andre Pearce
>            Priority: Blocker
>          Time Spent: 4h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> h1. ARTEMIS-1451 whilst may have removed syncronisation, increased latency as 
> the overhead of creating a new thread vs re-using an idle one is significant. 
> It is the main reason of a thread pool.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to