[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
clebert suconic updated ARTEMIS-2381:
-------------------------------------
Component/s: (was: ActiveMQ-Artemis-Native)
Broker
> ActiveMQJMSConnectionFactory - Allow to configure brokerURL via setter
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-2381
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2381
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 2.9.0
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Assignee: clebert suconic
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When setting up a ConnectionFactory for Artemis via the artemis-client, it
> would be great if we can configure this via getter/setter style, which allows
> to configure this nicely via properties such as from application.properties
> etc.
> In Apache Camel we want to be able to do
> {code}
> camel.component.jms.connectionFactory=#class:org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQJMSConnectionFactory
> camel.component.jms.connectionFactory.brokerURL=tcp://localhost:61616
> {code}
> Notice how we in the 1st line refer to which class to use (creates via
> default constructor) and then 2nd line sets the brokerURL, and the following
> can be used to set other properties such as username and password etc.
> However as setBrokerURL is private we cannot do this
> {code}
> private void setBrokerURL(String brokerURL) {
> ConnectionFactoryParser cfParser = new ConnectionFactoryParser();
> try {
> URI uri = cfParser.expandURI(brokerURL);
> this.serverLocator = ServerLocatorImpl.newLocator(uri);
> cfParser.populateObject(uri, this);
> } catch (Exception var4) {
> throw new RuntimeException(var4.getMessage(), var4);
> }
> if (this.getUser() == null) {
> this.setUser(DefaultConnectionProperties.DEFAULT_USER);
> }
> if (this.getPassword() == null) {
> this.setPassword(DefaultConnectionProperties.DEFAULT_PASSWORD);
> }
> }
> {code}
> Would it be possible to make this method public?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
