[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-589?focusedWorklogId=276400&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-276400
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on AMQNET-589:
-----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 14/Jul/19 17:11
Start Date: 14/Jul/19 17:11
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: HavretGC commented on pull request #4: AMQNET-589:
Failover implementation
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/4#discussion_r303253206
##########
File path: src/NMS.AMQP/NmsMessageConsumer.cs
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,466 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+using System;
+using System.Threading.Tasks;
+using Apache.NMS.AMQP.Message;
+using Apache.NMS.AMQP.Meta;
+using Apache.NMS.AMQP.Provider;
+using Apache.NMS.AMQP.Util;
+using Apache.NMS.Util;
+
+namespace Apache.NMS.AMQP
+{
+ public class NmsMessageConsumer : IMessageConsumer
+ {
+ private static readonly object SyncRoot = new object();
+ private readonly AcknowledgementMode acknowledgementMode;
+ private readonly AtomicBool closed = new AtomicBool();
+ private readonly MessageDeliveryTask deliveryTask;
+ private readonly PriorityMessageQueue messageQueue = new
PriorityMessageQueue();
+ private readonly AtomicBool started = new AtomicBool();
+
+ private Exception failureCause;
+
+ public NmsMessageConsumer(Id consumerId, NmsSession session,
IDestination destination, string selector, bool noLocal) : this(consumerId,
session, destination, null, selector, noLocal)
+ {
+ }
+
+ public NmsMessageConsumer(Id consumerId, NmsSession session,
IDestination destination, string name, string selector, bool noLocal)
+ {
+ Session = session;
+ acknowledgementMode = session.AcknowledgementMode;
+
+ if (destination.IsTemporary)
+ {
+
session.Connection.CheckConsumeFromTemporaryDestination((NmsTemporaryDestination)
destination);
+ }
+
+ Info = new ConsumerInfo(consumerId, Session.SessionInfo.Id)
+ {
+ Destination = destination,
+ Selector = selector,
+ NoLocal = noLocal,
+ SubscriptionName = name
+ };
+ deliveryTask = new MessageDeliveryTask(this);
+
+ if (Session.IsStarted)
+ Start();
+ }
+
+ public NmsSession Session { get; }
+ public ConsumerInfo Info { get; }
+ public IDestination Destination => Info.Destination;
+
+ public void Dispose()
+ {
+ try
+ {
+ Close();
+ }
+ catch (Exception ex)
+ {
+ Tracer.DebugFormat("Caught exception while disposing {0} {1}.
Exception {2}", GetType().Name, Info, ex);
+ }
+ }
+
+ public void Close()
+ {
+ if (closed.Value)
+ return;
+
+ lock (SyncRoot)
+ {
+ Shutdown(null);
+
Session.Connection.DestroyResource(Info).ConfigureAwait(false).GetAwaiter().GetResult();
+ }
+ }
+
+ public ConsumerTransformerDelegate ConsumerTransformer { get; set; }
+
+ event MessageListener IMessageConsumer.Listener
+ {
+ add
+ {
+ CheckClosed();
+ lock (SyncRoot)
+ {
+ Listener += value;
+ DrainMessageQueueToListener();
+ }
+ }
+ remove
+ {
+ lock (SyncRoot)
+ {
+ Listener -= value;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ public IMessage Receive()
+ {
+ CheckClosed();
+ CheckMessageListener();
+
+ while (true)
+ {
+ if (started)
+ {
+ return ReceiveInternal(-1);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ public IMessage ReceiveNoWait()
+ {
+ CheckClosed();
+ CheckMessageListener();
+
+ return started ? ReceiveInternal(0) : null;
+ }
+
+ public IMessage Receive(TimeSpan timeout)
+ {
+ CheckClosed();
+ CheckMessageListener();
+
+ int timeoutInMilliseconds = (int) timeout.TotalMilliseconds;
+
+ if (started)
+ {
+ return ReceiveInternal(timeoutInMilliseconds);
+ }
+
+ long deadline = GetDeadline(timeoutInMilliseconds);
+
+ while (true)
+ {
+ timeoutInMilliseconds = (int) (deadline -
DateTime.UtcNow.Ticks / 10_000L);
+ if (timeoutInMilliseconds < 0)
+ {
+ return null;
+ }
+
+ if (started)
+ {
+ return ReceiveInternal(timeoutInMilliseconds);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ private void CheckMessageListener()
+ {
+ if (HasMessageListener())
+ {
+ throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot synchronously receive
a message when a MessageListener is set");
+ }
+ }
+
+ private void CheckClosed()
+ {
+ if (closed)
+ {
+ throw new IllegalStateException("The MessageConsumer is
closed");
+ }
+ }
+
+ private event MessageListener Listener;
+
+ public async Task Init()
+ {
+ await Session.Connection.CreateResource(Info);
+ await Session.Connection.StartResource(Info);
+ }
+
+ public void OnInboundMessage(InboundMessageDispatch envelope)
+ {
+ SetAcknowledgeCallback(envelope);
+
+ if (envelope.EnqueueFirst)
+ messageQueue.EnqueueFirst(envelope);
+ else
+ messageQueue.Enqueue(envelope);
+
+ if (Session.IsStarted && Listener != null)
+ {
+ Session.EnqueueForDispatch(deliveryTask);
+ }
+ }
+
+ private void DeliverNextPending()
+ {
+ if (Session.IsStarted && started && Listener != null)
+ {
+ var envelope = messageQueue.DequeueNoWait();
+ if (envelope == null)
+ return;
+
+ lock (SyncRoot)
Review comment:
Not sure if we really want to maintain messageQueue state as this
information is already represented by consumer's ```started``` field. The
reason why this race condition might happen is lack of double check inside the
lock statement. This is what Qpid jms is doing under the hood when you try to
dequeue next element. In fact, as I'm looking at this implementation, there is
still a risk of having null pointer exception on message listener there. As
dequeueNoWait do not check if message listener is a null, sb may clear
messageListener field after the check on top of the method and taking the lock.
The suggested change is to add the double check and this should solve the
problem.
```
private void DeliverNextPending()
{
if (Session.IsStarted && started && Listener != null)
{
lock (SyncRoot)
{
if (started && Listener != null)
{
var envelope = messageQueue.DequeueNoWait();
if (envelope == null)
return;
// the rest of the method
}
}
}
}
```
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 276400)
Time Spent: 4h 20m (was: 4h 10m)
> NMS AMQP Failover implementation
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQNET-589
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-589
> Project: ActiveMQ .Net
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ActiveMQ, AMQP, NMS
> Affects Versions: 1.8.0
> Reporter: Krzysztof Porebski
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 4h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Implement failover in NMS AMQP the same way as it is implemented in QpidJMS.
> This will involve some major rework, as current design is too rigid to
> introduce this feature.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
