[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17019795#comment-17019795
]
Justin Bertram commented on ARTEMIS-2375:
-----------------------------------------
bq. I need to have the wildcard consumer OR another consumer on a non-wildcard
matching address be able to consume.
That's the bit from your use-case that I was missing. I understand now, and I
agree you can't do that with any form of wildcard address as it currently
exists or with the changes I proposed. What you're implementing is a brand new
feature completely outside of existing functionality - a true wildcard
*consumer*.
I'm a bit concerned at this point that these nuances will be difficult to
communicate to users. Also, will you be able to have both wildcard addresses
and wildcard consumers on the same broker at the same time?
> JMS, Wildcard destination consumer, and Acknowledgements going to wrong queue
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-2375
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2375
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.9.0
> Reporter: Craig Schmidt
> Assignee: Justin Bertram
> Priority: Major
>
> I have an ActiveMQ server set up where I have multiple (and unbounded) queues
> which differ only in the last component. e.g. myqueue.1, myqueue.2,
> myqueue.4, etc. The last component is from a database that will have a
> varying set of customers defined - and I want to set up one queue for each
> customer. (I want a separate queue - the third party we're talking to needs
> throttling at our 'customer' level.
> The address setting looks like this in broker.xml:
> {code:xml}
> <address-setting match="myqueue.#">
> <dead-letter-address>myqueue.DLQ</dead-letter-address>
> <expiry-address>myqueue.ExpiryQueue</expiry-address>
> <redelivery-delay>500</redelivery-delay>
> <max-size-bytes>-1</max-size-bytes>
> <message-counter-history-day-limit>10</message-counter-history-day-limit>
> <address-full-policy>PAGE</address-full-policy>
> <auto-create-queues>true</auto-create-queues>
> <auto-create-addresses>true</auto-create-addresses>
> <auto-create-jms-queues>true</auto-create-jms-queues>
> <auto-create-jms-topics>true</auto-create-jms-topics>
> <max-delivery-attempts>3</max-delivery-attempts>
> </address-setting>
> {code}
> I have a producer that creates the queue name based on the customer key, and
> uses JmsMessagingTemplate.convertAndSent(queueName, message). I have a
> consumer annotated like this:
> {code:java}
> @JmsListener(destination = "myqueue.#", containerFactory =
> "throttledLongCodeFactory")
> public void processLongCodeMessage1(Session session, Message<MessageRequest>
> message) throws JMSException {
> //... do the message handling - no ActiveMQ accesses in here...
> session.commit();
> }
> {code}
> FWIW, here's the code for the throttledLongCodeFactory:
> {code:java}
> @Bean public DefaultJmsListenerContainerFactory
> throttledLongCodeFactory(DefaultJmsListenerContainerFactoryConfigurer
> configurer) {
> ActiveMQConnectionFactory connectionFactory =
> createActiveMQConnectionFactory();
> // For throttling. Used to limit the number of messages a consumer will
> handle per second. Default is -1.
> Integer maxConsumerRate =
> appProperties.getArtemis().getLongCode().getMaxConsumerRate();
> if (maxConsumerRate != null) {
> connectionFactory.setConsumerMaxRate(maxConsumerRate);
> }
> // This provides all boot's default to this factory, including the message
> converter
> DefaultJmsListenerContainerFactory factory = new
> DefaultJmsListenerContainerFactory();
> configurer.configure(factory, connectionFactory);
> return factory;
> }
> {code}
> What I'm finding in looking at the ActiveMQ Management Console is that the
> consumer ACK's are going to a (new) queue "myqueue.#" (i.e. literally has the
> '#' in the name), rather than the actual source queue for each message. In
> the consumer, I can see the actual source queue name (e.g. "myqueue.2") by
> inspecting the ClientMessageImpl field 'address'. What I'd like is for the
> ACK's to go to the source queue. the way it is, my specific queues are just
> building up the number of messages they contain, which isn't doing the
> Artemis server memory any good.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
