[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17108260#comment-17108260
 ] 

Gary Tully commented on AMQ-7485:
---------------------------------

There is an existing rollbackOnly flag that we can check in a producer and flip 
in the RAR managed connection context. This flag is reset on the next 
transaction boundary which is what we want.
In this way, any use of a producer on a session with an aborted transaction 
will fail early and report an illegal state, preventing any spurious non 
transacted message production in error. 

> RAR managed producer is unaware of timed out transaction; sends non 
> transacted message in error
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-7485
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7485
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: RAR, XA
>    Affects Versions: 5.15.0
>         Environment: JEE RAR
>            Reporter: Gary Tully
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: RAR, XA, xaresource
>             Fix For: 5.16.0
>
>
> There is a problem with a RAR managed connection enlisted in a xa transaction 
> that aborts, if that connection is used to produce messages.
> getConnection succeeds and enlists the resource, the session is in an xa 
> transaction, all is good. 
> If however, the transaction times out and aborts, *before* a producer gets to 
> send(), the send will *not* see a transaction context and will produce a 
> message with no transaction identity in error.
> The abort forces an end(fail) and rollback, however this results in the 
> transaction context being unset and the producer session not being aware of 
> the aborted transaction.
> The transaction management is external in the case of a managed connection 
> and the default is non transactional in the absence of an external or RAR 
> local transaction. 
> Getting a reference to the TransactionManager and doing a transaction status 
> check before send is a workaround, but that should not be necessary.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to