[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3001?focusedWorklogId=513109&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-513109
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-3001:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 17/Nov/20 19:04
            Start Date: 17/Nov/20 19:04
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: clebertsuconic commented on pull request #3347:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3347#issuecomment-729137448


   if it's not too much to ask, can you add 1 or 2 tests into 
ActiveMQServerControlTest, and also make sure 
ActiveMQServerControlUsingCoreTest would work (as you may have to do a quick 
tweak not he proxy)?


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 513109)
    Time Spent: 20m  (was: 10m)

> Provide address and queue count via ActiveMQServerControl
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-3001
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3001
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: JMX
>    Affects Versions: 2.16.0
>            Reporter: Sebastian T
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The accompanying PR introduces two new methods *getAddressCount* and 
> *getQueueCount* to the *ActiveMQServerControl* class to retrieve the current 
> number of addresses and current number of queues on the broker.
> We want to monitor these number via our APM. Currently we have to use 
> *ActiveMQServerControl#getAddressNames().size()* and 
> *ActiveMQServerControl#getQueueNames().size()* which however are too 
> expensive for our use case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to