[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3106?focusedWorklogId=570417&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-570417
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-3106:
-------------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 23/Mar/21 13:06
Start Date: 23/Mar/21 13:06
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: gemmellr commented on a change in pull request #3470:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3470#discussion_r599548853
##########
File path:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/sasl/SaslScramTest.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ * <p>
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ * <p>
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.amqp.sasl;
+
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
+
+import java.io.File;
+
+import javax.jms.Connection;
+import javax.jms.ConnectionFactory;
+import javax.jms.JMSException;
+import javax.jms.MessageConsumer;
+import javax.jms.MessageProducer;
+import javax.jms.Queue;
+import javax.jms.Session;
+import javax.jms.TextMessage;
+
+import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.embedded.EmbeddedActiveMQ;
+import
org.apache.activemq.artemis.spi.core.security.ActiveMQJAASSecurityManager;
+import org.apache.qpid.jms.JmsConnectionFactory;
+import org.apache.qpid.jms.exceptions.JMSSecuritySaslException;
+import org.junit.AfterClass;
+import org.junit.BeforeClass;
+import org.junit.Test;
+
+/**
+ * This test SASL-SCRAM Support
+ */
+public class SaslScramTest {
+
+ private static EmbeddedActiveMQ BROKER;
+
+ @BeforeClass
+ public static void startBroker() throws Exception {
+ String loginConfPath = new
File(SaslScramTest.class.getResource("/login.config").toURI()).getAbsolutePath();
+ System.out.println(loginConfPath);
+ System.setProperty("java.security.auth.login.config", loginConfPath);
+ BROKER = new EmbeddedActiveMQ();
+
BROKER.setConfigResourcePath(SaslScramTest.class.getResource("/broker-saslscram.xml").toExternalForm());
+ BROKER.setSecurityManager(new
ActiveMQJAASSecurityManager("artemis-sasl-scram"));
+ BROKER.start();
+ }
+
+ @AfterClass
+ public static void shutdownBroker() throws Exception {
+ BROKER.stop();
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void testUnencryptedWorksWithAllMechanism() throws JMSException {
+ sendRcv("SCRAM-SHA-1", "hello", "ogre1234");
+ sendRcv("SCRAM-SHA-256", "hello", "ogre1234");
+ }
+
+ @Test(expected = JMSSecuritySaslException.class)
+ public void testEncryptedWorksOnlyWithMechanism() throws JMSException {
+ sendRcv("SCRAM-SHA-1", "test", "test");
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void testEncryptedWorksWithMechanism() throws JMSException {
+ sendRcv("SCRAM-SHA-256", "test", "test");
+ }
Review comment:
I think that probably just betrays its age, when SHA-1 was still widely
recommended. The SCRAM-SHA-256 RFC specifically opens talking to it having
expected longer longeveity than SHA-1 based mechs, and also later recommends
transition to SHA-256. Technically one could implement it (e.g seperately in
its own module) without offering it normally and still satisfy that original
wording hehe. I'm not agaisnt it being there, though I dont see anyone needing
it at this point, removing it was mostly a simple reoute to resolve the
multi-types issue and adopt single-mech-per-module semantics in one swoop.
The latter wording doesnt surprise me, its jsut how SASL is meant to
work...if you offer mechanisms that means they work, and the client is free to
pick whatever one they can/want and it should work.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 570417)
Time Spent: 11h 40m (was: 11.5h)
> Support for SASL-SCRAM
> ----------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-3106
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3106
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: AMQP
> Reporter: Christoph Läubrich
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 11h 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> With the enhancements in ARTEMIS-33 / [PR
> 3432|https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3432] it would be now
> possible to plug-in new SASL mechanism.
> One popular one is
> [SASL-SCRAM|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salted_Challenge_Response_Authentication_Mechanism]
> because it allows channelbinding together with secure storage of
> user-credential.
> I have created an [implementation of this for Artemis
> AMQP|https://github.com/laeubi/scram-sasl/tree/artemis/artemis] based on the
> [SCRAM SASL authentication for Java|https://github.com/ogrebgr/scram-sasl]
> code with some enhancements/cleanups to the original.
> As the source is already Apache licensed I'd like to propose to include this
> in the Artemis code-base. This would greatly enhance the interoperability
> with other implementations e.g. Apache QPID.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
