[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17441303#comment-17441303
 ] 

Clebert Suconic commented on ARTEMIS-3509:
------------------------------------------

The best for you would be to reproduce the issue using a self contained example.

multiple producers, multiple consumers using the same semantics you use to send 
and consume.


Usually those tests would reproduce the issue much faster than what you see in 
a production system. Then you would be able to alternate between 2.16 and 2.19 
and verify if the issue is fixed or not. We would at that point have a way to 
debug your issue.

> STOMP Websocket client disconnected after ConcurrentModificationException in 
> Broker
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-3509
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3509
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 2.16.0
>            Reporter: Elodie Vandromme
>            Priority: Major
>
> Web clients connected through WebSocket are randomly disconnected from 
> artemis broker without notification of the disconnection.
> A ConcurrentModificationException is raised;
> {noformat}
> [2021-09-28 10:26:53,591] - [WILDFLY] - [WARN ] - [Thread-11 
> ([ActiveMQ-server-org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl$6@444dc7ba|mailto:ActiveMQ-server-org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl$6@444dc7ba])]
>  - [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server] : *AMQ222151: removing consumer 
> which did not handle a message*, consumer=ServerConsumerImpl [id=1990, 
> filter=null, binding=LocalQueueBinding [address=jms.topic.defended_assetFull, 
> queue=QueueImpl[name=d1586796-2035-11ec-8d2e-00505689a76b, 
> postOffice=PostOfficeImpl 
> [server=ActiveMQServerImpl::serverUUID=2f00c36f-2034-11ec-8d2e-00505689a76b], 
> temp=true]@4180826b, filter=null, name=d1586796-2035-11ec-8d2e-00505689a76b, 
> clusterName=d1586796-2035-11ec-8d2e-00505689a76b2f00c36f-2034-11ec-8d2e-00505689a76b]],
>  
> message=Reference[2019]:RELIABLE:CoreMessage[messageID=2019,durable=true,userID=d5e2d1c3-2035-11ec-8d2e-00505689a76b,priority=4,
>  timestamp=Tue Sep 28 10:26:53 CEST 2021,expiration=0, durable=true, 
> address=jms.topic.defended_assetFull,size=6520,properties=TypedProperties[__AMQ_CID=f9eab79a-2034-11ec-8d2e-00505689a76b,_AMQ_ROUTING_TYPE=0]]@155890432:
>  java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
>                     at 
> java.util.ArrayList$Itr.checkForComodification(ArrayList.java:909)
>                     at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:859)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.RefsOperation.afterCommit(RefsOperation.java:179)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.transaction.impl.TransactionImpl.afterCommit(TransactionImpl.java:579)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.transaction.impl.TransactionImpl.access$100(TransactionImpl.java:40)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.transaction.impl.TransactionImpl$2.done(TransactionImpl.java:322)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.persistence.impl.journal.OperationContextImpl.executeOnCompletion(OperationContextImpl.java:190)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.persistence.impl.journal.OperationContextImpl.executeOnCompletion(OperationContextImpl.java:128)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.persistence.impl.journal.AbstractJournalStorageManager.afterCompleteOperations(AbstractJournalStorageManager.java:321)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.transaction.impl.TransactionImpl.commit(TransactionImpl.java:313)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.transaction.impl.TransactionImpl.commit(TransactionImpl.java:264)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ServerSessionImpl.commit(ServerSessionImpl.java:1284)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.stomp.StompSession$1.run(StompSession.java:164)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.stomp.StompSession.afterDelivery(StompSession.java:116)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ServerConsumerImpl.proceedDeliver(ServerConsumerImpl.java:511)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.QueueImpl.proceedDeliver(QueueImpl.java:3744)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.QueueImpl.deliver(QueueImpl.java:3048)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.QueueImpl.access$2400(QueueImpl.java:125)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.QueueImpl$DeliverRunner.run(QueueImpl.java:4119)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.doTask(OrderedExecutor.java:42)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.doTask(OrderedExecutor.java:31)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.ProcessorBase.executePendingTasks(ProcessorBase.java:65)
>                     at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>                     at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>                     at 
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.ActiveMQThreadFactory$1.run(ActiveMQThreadFactory.java:118)
> {noformat}
> Artemis (2.16.0) is deployed in Wildfly (24.0.1.Final)
> Clients are connected to stomp acceptor:
> {code:xml}
> <acceptor name="stomp-over-ws" 
> factory-class="org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.remoting.impl.netty.NettyAcceptorFactory">
>    <param name="host" value="0.0.0.0" />
>    <param name="protocols" value="STOMP" />
>    <param name="port" value="61614" />
> </acceptor>
> {code}
> Bug is random but is reproduced quite often with a full scenario we have (on 
> one topic or another) so we are able to reproduce it and add logs if 
> necessary.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to