[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3707?focusedWorklogId=765370&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-765370
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-3707:
-------------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 03/May/22 11:26
Start Date: 03/May/22 11:26
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: gemmellr commented on PR #4044:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4044#issuecomment-1115990630
You have definitely misunderstood me. Though I did query at one point why
the new rar modules were being added, as they seemed largely duplication of the
example and their presence wasnt clear based on the documentation also being
added that said you _must_ build your own like the example, we then discussed
why on the PR. I reviewed the PR multiple times after without saying 'remove
these', and even added stuff to the build myself so you could use it to more
easily action some prior feedback I had given, plus when you asked if the PR
was dead I said no. You then closed it and raised the other of somewhat
different PRs.
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 765370)
Time Spent: 8h 40m (was: 8.5h)
> ResourceAdapter improvements
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-3707
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3707
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Waldi
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.23.0
>
> Time Spent: 8h 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Hi Everybody,
> I've tried to install the resourceAdapter in openliberty/WLP by myself. I've
> got in some troubles and fixed it by myself. Now, I would like to provide the
> modifications and a small piece of documentation of the resourceAdapter, if
> interested.
> * Sample config / project for openliberty/WLP
> * remove usage of the transactionManager in the resource adapter
> * fix the jakarta ra.xml namespaces and classnames
> * create a maven build for a rar archive with fewer dependencies and
> therefore a smaller footprint.
> I took notice of ARTEMIS-1487 and ARTEMIS-1614. In my opinion, with my
> contributions, we can close these issues. Can you tell me your thoughts and
> give me feedback?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)