[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8322?focusedWorklogId=766777&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-766777
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on AMQ-8322:
---------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 05/May/22 16:51
            Start Date: 05/May/22 16:51
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: gemmellr commented on PR #729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/729#issuecomment-1118822433

   I'll admit I gave up before the end as many of the comments seem to apply to 
a lot of the tests and I got bored seeing/saying the same things, but I cant 
say I saw an actual _unit_ test despite the various comments about them. Just 
lots of system/integration tests running up full brokers and clients, often to 
check things that dont even hit the wire at all. Given a lot of this stuff just 
wraps existing impl it is easy to unit test those wrapping bits in isolation, 
system testing all of it in that way seems largely just a waste, but even more 
so when also repeating tests for every type of destination or message type or 
ack mode etc....and doing so without _any_ unit tests that could achivee the 
same more quickly and give better errors on failure etc.




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 766777)
    Time Spent: 12h 50m  (was: 12h 40m)

> Implement JMS 2.0 Connection createContext methods
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-8322
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8322
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Matt Pavlovich
>            Assignee: Matt Pavlovich
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: #jms2
>             Fix For: 5.18.0
>
>          Time Spent: 12h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Add support for JMSContext, JMSProducer and JMSConsumer for working with 
> queues



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to