[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Anton Roskvist updated ARTEMIS-4325:
------------------------------------
    Description: 
This would be similar to the "priorityBackup" functionality in the ActiveMQ 5 
broker.

The primary use case for this is to more easily maintain a good distribution of 
consumers and producers across a broker cluster.

 

The intended behavior for my own purposes would be something like:

 - Ensure an even distribution across the broker cluster when first connecting 
a high throughput client.
 - When a broker becomes unavailable (network outage, patch, crash, whatever), 
move affected client workers to another broker in the cluster to maintain 
throughput.
 - When the original broker comes back, move the recently failed over resources 
to the original broker again.

  was:
This would be similar to the "priorityBackup" functionality in the ActiveMQ 5 
broker.

The primary use case for this is to more easily maintain a good distribution of 
consumers and producers across a broker cluster.

The intended behavior for my own purposes would be something like:
 
- Ensure an even distribution across the broker cluster when first connecting a 
high throughput client.
 - When a broker becomes unavailable (network outage, patch, crash, whatever), 
move affected client workers to another broker in the cluster to maintain 
throughput.
 - When the original broker comes back, move the recently failed over resources 
to the original broker again.


> Ability to failback after failover
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-4325
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4325
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Anton Roskvist
>            Priority: Major
>
> This would be similar to the "priorityBackup" functionality in the ActiveMQ 5 
> broker.
> The primary use case for this is to more easily maintain a good distribution 
> of consumers and producers across a broker cluster.
>  
> The intended behavior for my own purposes would be something like:
>  - Ensure an even distribution across the broker cluster when first 
> connecting a high throughput client.
>  - When a broker becomes unavailable (network outage, patch, crash, 
> whatever), move affected client workers to another broker in the cluster to 
> maintain throughput.
>  - When the original broker comes back, move the recently failed over 
> resources to the original broker again.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to