[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tobias Månsson updated ARTEMIS-4422:
------------------------------------
    Priority: Critical  (was: Major)

> High container memory usage per address size
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-4422
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4422
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.30.0
>         Environment: EKS bottlerocket containerd EC2 nodes.
> amazoncorretto:17 image (Java 17 JRE)
> Artemis 2.30.0
> 2 node cluster, with one node having producers and consumers and the other 
> acting as fail over
> persistance disabled
>            Reporter: Tobias Månsson
>            Priority: Critical
>
> We've had issues with high memory usage for our Artemis broker for a long 
> time, but yesterday several events raised a possible candidate to the cause.
> We had sudden drops in address size correlating to container memory drops, 
> and calculations show that each "address size" byte takes 40- 160 "container" 
> bytes.
> Is this normal and intended?
> Should the parameter max-size-bytes be multiplied by say 100 to get 
> "actually" container memory usage?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to