[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9394?focusedWorklogId=932383&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-932383
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on AMQ-9394:
---------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 29/Aug/24 11:49
Start Date: 29/Aug/24 11:49
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: cshannon commented on PR #1172:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1172#issuecomment-2317422844
ARTEMIS-4937 reminded me to ask this question as I forgot, have you tried
benchmarking this all or trying to verify we won't run into performance issues
with pinning? I know your PR mentions refactoring but it hasn't been done and
synchronized blocks are used all over the place. So I assume this will suffer
from that for now, but it of course depends if it's a real issue but something
we should communicate if it is.
Looks like at least the issue is on it's way to being solved (hopefully for
the next LTS release):
https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/loom-dev/2024-May/006632.html
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 932383)
Time Spent: 2h (was: 1h 50m)
> Tech Preview: Virtual Thread support
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-9394
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9394
> Project: ActiveMQ Classic
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Matt Pavlovich
> Assignee: Matt Pavlovich
> Priority: Major
> Labels: #virtualthread
> Fix For: 6.2.0
>
> Time Spent: 2h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Initial technical preview of Virtual Thread support
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
