[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Bertram updated ARTEMIS-5048:
------------------------------------
Description:
We've traditionally used {{org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.Base64}} for
Base64 encoding/decoding. This implementation is based on public domain code
from http://iharder.net/base64.
In Java 8 {{java.util.Base64}} was introduced. I assumed we hadn't switched to
this implementation for performance reasons so I created a simple JMH-based
test to compare the two implementations and it appears to me that
{{java.util.Base64}} is significantly faster than our current implementation.
Using the JDK's class will simplify our code _and_ improve performance. Also,
it should be 100% backwards compatible since Base64 encoding/decoding is
standardized.
was:
We've traditionally used {{org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.Base64}} for
Base64 encoding/decoding. This implementation is based on public domain code
from http://iharder.net/base64.
In Java 5 {{java.util.Base64}} was introduced. I assumed we hadn't switched to
this implementation for performance reasons so I created a simple JMH-based
test to compare the two implementations and it appears to me that
{{java.util.Base64}} is significantly faster than our current implementation.
Using the JDK's class will simplify our code _and_ improve performance. Also,
it should be 100% backwards compatible since Base64 encoding/decoding is
standardized.
> Use java.util.Base64
> --------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-5048
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5048
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Justin Bertram
> Assignee: Justin Bertram
> Priority: Major
>
> We've traditionally used {{org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.Base64}} for
> Base64 encoding/decoding. This implementation is based on public domain code
> from http://iharder.net/base64.
> In Java 8 {{java.util.Base64}} was introduced. I assumed we hadn't switched
> to this implementation for performance reasons so I created a simple
> JMH-based test to compare the two implementations and it appears to me that
> {{java.util.Base64}} is significantly faster than our current implementation.
> Using the JDK's class will simplify our code _and_ improve performance. Also,
> it should be 100% backwards compatible since Base64 encoding/decoding is
> standardized.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
