[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17900383#comment-17900383
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ARTEMIS-5174:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1ba7bec2b607e562273d8d56f575eb2b3f47a3e9 in activemq-artemis's branch 
refs/heads/main from AntonRoskvist
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;h=1ba7bec2b6 ]

ARTEMIS-5174 Have dependabot ignore jgroups until JGRP-2794 is resolved


> Have dependabot ignore jgroups until JGRP-2794 is resolved
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-5174
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5174
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
>            Reporter: Anton Roskvist
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Before [JGRP-2794|https://issues.redhat.com/projects/JGRP/issues/JGRP-2794] 
> is resolved, jgroups provides compatibility between versions on a 
> "best-effort" basis. Since moving to upgrade jGroups through dependabot I 
> have seen multiple cases where "rolling upgrades" between broker versions in 
> a clustered setting does not work as intended.
> I therefore think dependency updates to jgroups should be made manually on a 
> case by case basis until the aforementioned jgroups Jira ticket is resolved.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to