Marcus Christie created AIRAVATA-2363:
-----------------------------------------

             Summary: Unable to configure logging with log4j.properties file
                 Key: AIRAVATA-2363
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-2363
             Project: Airavata
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Distribution
    Affects Versions: 0.17
            Reporter: Marcus Christie


Currently, when starting Airavata, I see this on the console:
{noformat}
SLF4J: Found binding in 
[jar:file:/home/airavata/master-deployment/api-orchestrator/apache-airavata-server-0.17-SNAPSHOT/lib/logback-classic-1.1.6.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: Found binding in 
[jar:file:/home/airavata/master-deployment/api-orchestrator/apache-airavata-server-0.17-SNAPSHOT/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.7.25.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: Found binding in 
[jar:file:/home/airavata/master-deployment/api-orchestrator/apache-airavata-server-0.17-SNAPSHOT/lib/slf4j-simple-1.7.25.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
{noformat}

This means that there are 3 different bindings for SLF4J. There should only be 
one.

It also appears that it is picking up the logback binding, although 
unfortunately it doesn't explicitly say so. I say that because I don't see any 
log4j messages when I add {{-Dlog4j.debug}} as an argument.

If I delete from the lib directory
* logback-classic-1.1.6.jar
* and slf4j-simple-1.7.25.jar

Then slf4j uses log4j and the log4j.properties file in the bin/ directory is 
used for configuration.

As it stands right now, we are providing a log4j.properties file in the bin/ 
directory of the distribution that doesn't actually do anything.  We should 
give users a way to configure logging.

I think there are a few options:
* go with log4j12 logging
** the logback logging was added, I think, for the Kafka integration, so 
removing logback would remove the Kafka integration
* go with logback logging
* switch to something else like log4j 2.x
** log4j 2 has Kafka integration, but I'm not sure how well it works



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to