[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-15407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Levas updated AMBARI-15407:
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Committed to trunk
{noformat}
commit bc2719a77e57f0225d4575c43038629250a1f903
Author: Robert Levas <rle...@hortonworks.com>
Date: Tue Mar 15 08:29:41 2016 -0400
{noformat}
> Fix ArtifactResourceProviderTest to avoid set ordering issues
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMBARI-15407
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-15407
> Project: Ambari
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ambari-server
> Affects Versions: 2.4.0
> Reporter: Robert Levas
> Assignee: Robert Levas
> Labels: unit-test
> Fix For: 2.4.0
>
> Attachments: AMBARI-15407_trunk_01.patch
>
>
> Due to the inconsistent ordering of resources in the set of Resources created
> in
> {{org.apache.ambari.server.controller.internal.ArtifactResourceProvider#getResources}},
>
> {{org.apache.ambari.server.controller.internal.ArtifactResourceProviderTest#testDeleteResources}}
> fails since the test case expects a certain order in which the Resource are
> processed.
> Since it doesn't really make a difference what order the resources are
> processed when deleting, the test case should be fixed to not care about
> that.
> The follow test failure has been encountered due to this:
> {noformat}
> java.lang.AssertionError:
> Unexpected method call
> ArtifactDAO.findByNameAndForeignKeys("test-artifact2", {cluster=500}):
> ArtifactDAO.findByForeignKeys({cluster=500}): expected: 1, actual: 1
> ArtifactDAO.findByNameAndForeignKeys("test-artifact", {cluster=500}):
> expected: 1, actual: 0
> at
> org.easymock.internal.MockInvocationHandler.invoke(MockInvocationHandler.java:44)
> at
> org.easymock.internal.ObjectMethodsFilter.invoke(ObjectMethodsFilter.java:94)
> at
> org.easymock.internal.ClassProxyFactory$MockMethodInterceptor.intercept(ClassProxyFactory.java:97)
> at
> org.apache.ambari.server.orm.dao.ArtifactDAO$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$40076a34.findByNameAndForeignKeys(<generated>)
> at
> org.apache.ambari.server.controller.internal.ArtifactResourceProvider$4.invoke(ArtifactResourceProvider.java:377)
> at
> org.apache.ambari.server.controller.internal.ArtifactResourceProvider$4.invoke(ArtifactResourceProvider.java:365)
> at
> org.apache.ambari.server.controller.internal.AbstractResourceProvider.invokeWithRetry(AbstractResourceProvider.java:451)
> at
> org.apache.ambari.server.controller.internal.AbstractResourceProvider.modifyResources(AbstractResourceProvider.java:332)
> at
> org.apache.ambari.server.controller.internal.ArtifactResourceProvider.deleteResources(ArtifactResourceProvider.java:245)
> at
> org.apache.ambari.server.controller.internal.ArtifactResourceProviderTest.testDeleteResources(ArtifactResourceProviderTest.java:435)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
> at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:157)
> at
> com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:78)
> at
> com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:212)
> at
> com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:68)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:140)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
