[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15269263#comment-15269263
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-16225:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12801967/AMBARI-16225.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
ambari-server.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/6755//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/6755//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Blueprint Deployed Clusters Throw Exceptions On Startup
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-16225
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-16225
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: ambari-2.4.0
>            Reporter: Sandor Magyari
>            Assignee: Sandor Magyari
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: ambari-2.4.0
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-16225.patch
>
>
> After deploying a cluster with standard services (ZK, HDFS, etc) using 
> blueprints, when user restarts Ambari, there are exceptions like below as the 
> server is starting up.
> {code}
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.controller.internal.Stack.<init>(Stack.java:164)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.topology.BlueprintImpl.parseStack(BlueprintImpl.java:292)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.topology.BlueprintImpl.<init>(BlueprintImpl.java:66)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.topology.BlueprintFactory.getBlueprint(BlueprintFactory.java:87)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.topology.PersistedStateImpl$ReplayedTopologyRequest.<init>(PersistedStateImpl.java:334)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.topology.PersistedStateImpl.getAllRequests(PersistedStateImpl.java:154)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.topology.TopologyManager.ensureInitialized(TopologyManager.java:126)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.topology.TopologyManager.onHostHeartBeatLost(TopologyManager.java:386)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.state.host.HostImpl$HostHeartbeatLostTransition.transition(HostImpl.java:408)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.state.host.HostImpl$HostHeartbeatLostTransition.transition(HostImpl.java:396)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.state.fsm.StateMachineFactory$SingleInternalArc.doTransition(StateMachineFactory.java:354)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.state.fsm.StateMachineFactory.doTransition(StateMachineFactory.java:294)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.state.fsm.StateMachineFactory.access$300(StateMachineFactory.java:39)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.state.fsm.StateMachineFactory$InternalStateMachine.doTransition(StateMachineFactory.java:440)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.state.host.HostImpl.handleEvent(HostImpl.java:584)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.agent.HeartbeatMonitor.doWork(HeartbeatMonitor.java:159)
>       at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.agent.HeartbeatMonitor.run(HeartbeatMonitor.java:120)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Looks like a the AMC is not initialized yet as the heartbeat from agents is 
> being handled. It doesn't seem to affect operation of the cluster, but it 
> looks really bad.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to