[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jungtaek Lim updated AMBARI-17027:
----------------------------------
    Attachment: AMS-grafana-query-metric-wildcard-without-series-aggregation.png
                
AMS-grafana-query-metric-wildcard-without-series-aggregation-avg.png
                
AMS-grafana-query-metric-wildcard-with-series-aggregation-sum.png
                
AMS-grafana-query-metric-wildcard-with-series-aggregation-avg-with-host.png

Attached screenshot.

Note: Graph seems odd when we provide hostname.
It's just a limitation of current Storm metrics (measure time mismatch between 
tasks), and it would be fine when we use 'minute' precision or remove hostname.

> Metrics Collector API: Introduce basic series aggregation functions
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-17027
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17027
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ambari-metrics
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Jungtaek Lim
>         Attachments: 
> AMS-grafana-query-metric-wildcard-with-series-aggregation-avg-with-host.png, 
> AMS-grafana-query-metric-wildcard-with-series-aggregation-sum.png, 
> AMS-grafana-query-metric-wildcard-without-series-aggregation-avg.png, 
> AMS-grafana-query-metric-wildcard-without-series-aggregation.png
>
>
> AMS doesn't provide tag so metric is identified by appId, metric name, 
> hostname, instanceId. In this situation metric name is normally consist of 
> origin metric name and tag values, like graphite, but unlike Graphite, AMS 
> also doesn't provide series aggregation functions so aggregation should be 
> done from caller side.
> It would be great if Ambari Metrics Collector provides series aggregation 
> functions, like sumSeries / averageSeries / minSeries / maxSeries on Graphite.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to