[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383040#comment-15383040
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-17753:
------------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12818609/AMBARI-17753.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
ambari-server.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/7909//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/7909//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Add some of value-attributes to property files in ZOOKEEPER
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-17753
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17753
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>         Environment: CentOS7.2, HDP2.4
>            Reporter: Masahiro Tanaka
>            Assignee: Masahiro Tanaka
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: AMBARI-17753.patch, after_zookeeper_capture.PNG, 
> zookeeper_capture.PNG
>
>
> Some of the property files in ZOOKEEPER lack value-attributes.
> It would be nice to have value-attributes on most of the properties. If so, 
> we can notice careless mistakes in Ambari Server WebUI.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to