[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15640213#comment-15640213
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-18761:
------------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12837535/AMBARI-18761.3.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/9154//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/9154//console

This message is automatically generated.

> NTP check fails even if chrony is working on CentOS7
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-18761
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18761
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: trunk, 2.4.1
>         Environment: CentOS7.2, Ambari 2.4.1
>            Reporter: Masahiro Tanaka
>            Assignee: Masahiro Tanaka
>         Attachments: AMBARI-18761.1.patch, AMBARI-18761.2.patch, 
> AMBARI-18761.3.patch, AMBARI-18761.patch
>
>
> I use CentOS 7 as a host OS. When the host check runs, it shows warning. The 
> warning says "The following services should be up: Service ntpd."
> I think "chrony" is a default NTP client and server on CentOS7. So We should 
> check if there are ntpd or chronyd on a host.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to