[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15657650#comment-15657650
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-18857:
------------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12838567/AMBARI-18857.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 2 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
ambari-server.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/9239//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/9239//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Add Service wizard: Storm site configs related to Ambari metrics service are 
> not displayed on ui
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-18857
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18857
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-metrics
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Aravindan Vijayan
>            Assignee: Aravindan Vijayan
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.5.0
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-18857.patch
>
>
> This issue is result of storm site being scattered between Storm service and 
> AMS service. 
> Its highly recommended to avoid such scattering of config sites across 
> services. Doing so requires special handling on FE and generates lots of new 
> flows that needs to be tested.
> storm site should only belong and be packaged inside Storm service. If there 
> are some configs of storm-site that needs to be added if AMS is present then 
> stack advisor can be leveraged to achieve that objective



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to