[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15663704#comment-15663704
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-18870:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12838714/AMBARI-18870.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 4 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The test build failed in ambari-server 

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/9248//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/9248//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Ranger PID file not being read if a custom location is provided
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-18870
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18870
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.4.2
>            Reporter: Mugdha Varadkar
>            Assignee: Mugdha Varadkar
>             Fix For: 2.5.0
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-18870.patch
>
>
> Ranger PID file is not being read if a custom location is provided from 
> Ambari.
> Fix include creation of .sh file which will have env variable with value as 
> PID path. This .sh file will get executed by start script of service to make 
> the env variable value to be taken into consideration.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to