[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-19077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15730251#comment-15730251
]
Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-19077:
------------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12842215/rb54357.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in
ambari-server:
org.apache.ambari.server.controller.internal.UpgradeResourceProviderTest
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/9582//testReport/
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/9582//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Ambari-server: Gather dependent configuration types and password properties
> for a service component
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMBARI-19077
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-19077
> Project: Ambari
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: ambari-agent, ambari-server
> Affects Versions: 2.5.0
> Reporter: Nahappan Somasundaram
> Assignee: Nahappan Somasundaram
> Fix For: 2.5.0
>
> Attachments: rb54357.patch
>
>
> In the command JSON, we need the list of configurations and the corresponding
> password properties on which a service component is dependent upon. This will
> help ambari agent create the JCEKS provider files for just those affected
> configuration types instead of for all configuration types that contain
> password properties.
> We also need to provide the password properties and the properties that use
> it. This will ensure that we are able to correctly map the value provided by
> the user property to the value provided by the password property.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
