[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15945291#comment-15945291
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-20603:
------------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12860861/AMBARI-20603.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/11213//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/11213//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Hadoop QA compiles trunk twice
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-20603
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20603
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Doroszlai, Attila
>            Assignee: Doroszlai, Attila
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-20603.patch
>
>
> * The "Pre-build trunk" step of the [Ambari-trunk-test-patch 
> job|https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/] compiles Ambari 
> twice, unnecessarily increasing elapsed time by 5-6 minutes.
> * RAT check is executed twice: in the "javac warnings" and the "release audit 
> warnings" steps.  The problem is that the report with the list of any files 
> that failed the RAT check is made available only in the second step, which is 
> not run if the check fails in the first step.  The only way to find offenders 
> is to run the check locally.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to