[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15976802#comment-15976802
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-20802:
------------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12864273/AMBARI-20802_trunk.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
ambari-server.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/11425//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/11425//console

This message is automatically generated.

> StackAdvisor should not recommend configuration types for services that are 
> not present in the cluster
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-20802
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20802
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Vitaly Brodetskyi
>            Assignee: Vitaly Brodetskyi
>             Fix For: 2.5.1
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-20802_trunk.patch
>
>
> When a minimal Blueprint install was attempted in that issue, some failures 
> occurred during the Blueprint deployment.
> After some investigation, we determined that the Blueprints processor was 
> throwing a NullPointerException, due to some configuration types being 
> considered "updated", even though those configuration types are not included 
> in the "desired configuration" for the cluster, since the services associated 
> with those configuration types are not deployed in this current cluster.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to