[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15979743#comment-15979743
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-20818:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12864540/AMBARI-20818.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests in 
ambari-server:

                  
org.apache.ambari.server.topology.ClusterInstallWithoutStartTest
                  
org.apache.ambari.server.topology.ClusterDeployWithStartOnlyTest
                  org.apache.ambari.server.state.UpgradeHelperTest
                  
org.apache.ambari.server.topology.ClusterInstallWithoutStartOnComponentLevelTest

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/11455//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Blueprint processor fails when StackAdvisor recommends unnecessary 
> configuration types
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-20818
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20818
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-server
>            Reporter: Sandor Magyari
>            Assignee: Sandor Magyari
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-20818.patch
>
>
> When deploying a minimal Blueprint, that only included the Hive 
> MetaStoreServer and Zookeeper, without any other services the deployment 
> failed, and was stuck in the "PENDING" state.  
> The root cause is the following exception in ambari-server.log:
> {code}
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>         at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.topology.AmbariContext.waitForConfigurationResolution(AmbariContext.java:430)
>         at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.topology.ClusterConfigurationRequest.setConfigurationsOnCluster(ClusterConfigurationRequest.java:496)
>         at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.topology.ClusterConfigurationRequest.setConfigurationsOnCluster(ClusterConfigurationRequest.java:406)
>         at 
> org.apache.ambari.server.topology.ClusterConfigurationRequest.process(ClusterConfigurationRequest.java:159)
>         at org.apache.ambari.server.topology.tasks.
> {code}
> The problem is that Blueprints processor receives some configuration 
> recommendations from the StackAdvisor for "yarn-site" and "yarn-env", even 
> though Yarn is not present in the cluster. This causes the Blueprint 
> processor to treat these types as updated, and will eventually cause the 
> NullPointerException I mentioned above.
> This causes the cluster configuration to be in an inconsistent state, and the 
> Blueprint deployment won't necessarily complete properly, although some 
> manual configuration changes would likely result in a working cluster.
> The Blueprint processor should be updated to ignore any configuration types 
> recommended by the StackAdvisor that are not needed for the current cluster.  
> Usually, these types are from services that are not selected for the cluster. 
>  
> If a recommendation is present for a configuration type that is not included 
> in the "desired configurations" for a cluster, the Blueprint processor should 
> ignore this configuration type, and perhaps log some time of warning, so that 
> the user is aware that some recommendations were made that are not being 
> used.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to