[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-21910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16167826#comment-16167826
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-21910:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12887336/AMBARI-21910.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/12238//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Ranger Usersync config to support nested group evaluation for LDAP Sync 
> source property
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-21910
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-21910
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Mugdha Varadkar
>            Assignee: Mugdha Varadkar
>             Fix For: trunk, 2.6.0
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-21910.patch
>
>
> As part of RANGER-1735, we are supporting nested groups in ranger usersync. 
> For this, introduced one new property 
> "ranger.usersync.ldap.grouphierarchylevels". The value should be an integer 
> with default value as 0. This property should be under Ranger --> Configs --> 
> Ranger User Info --> Group Configs tab.
> This property can be enabled with a flag labelled as "Sync Nested Groups". 
> 1. Default value for this flag is "No"
> 2. This flag is always shown under Group Configs (even when "Enable group 
> Sync" is set to "No")
> 3. If this flag is set to "No", then the value for 
> ranger.usersync.ldap.grouphierarchylevels is hidden and is set to "0". 
> 4. If this flag is set to "Yes", then 
> ranger.usersync.ldap.grouphierarchylevels is shown and allowed to set any 
> integer greater than 0.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to