[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16197377#comment-16197377
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-22174:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12891090/AMBARI-22174.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The test build failed in 
[ambari-server|https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/12466//artifact/patch-work/testrun_ambari-server.txt]
 

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/12466//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Remove unnecessary Kerberos related properties from 
> BlueprintConfigurationProcessor
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-22174
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22174
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Sandor Magyari
>            Assignee: Sandor Magyari
>         Attachments: AMBARI-22174.patch
>
>
> Remove unnecessary properties from BlueprintConfigurationProcessor:
> oozie.service.HadoopAccessorService.kerberos.principal
> oozie.service.HadoopAccessorService.kerberos.principal
> templeton.kerberos.principal
> *.falcon.service.authentication.kerberos.principal
> *.falcon.http.authentication.kerberos.principal
> These properties are handled by KerberosHelper, there's no need to handle 
> them in BlueprintConfigurationProcessor.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to