[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16199207#comment-16199207
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-22191:
------------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12891299/AMBARI-22191.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
ambari-server.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/12476//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Druid stack advisor for memory does not account number of merge buffers while 
> calculating processing buffer size
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-22191
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22191
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Nishant Bangarwa
>            Assignee: Nishant Bangarwa
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: trunk, 2.6.0
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-22191.patch
>
>
> This is leading to OOME with default configs on a 16 core machine with 16G of 
> ram. 
> {code} 
> 5) Error in custom provider, java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
>   at 
> io.druid.guice.DruidProcessingModule.getMergeBufferPool(DruidProcessingModule.java:124)
>  (via modules: com.google.inject.util.Modules$OverrideModule -> 
> com.google.inject.util.Modules$OverrideModule -> 
> io.druid.guice.DruidProcessingModule)
>   at 
> io.druid.guice.DruidProcessingModule.getMergeBufferPool(DruidProcessingModule.java:124)
>  (via modules: com.google.inject.util.Modules$OverrideModule -> 
> com.google.inject.util.Modules$OverrideModule -> 
> io.druid.guice.DruidProcessingModule)
>   while locating io.druid.collections.BlockingPool<java.nio.ByteBuffer> 
> annotated with @io.druid.guice.annotations.Merging()
>     for the 4th parameter of 
> io.druid.query.groupby.strategy.GroupByStrategyV2.<init>(GroupByStrategyV2.java:97)
>   while locating io.druid.query.groupby.strategy.GroupByStrategyV2
>     for the 3rd parameter of 
> io.druid.query.groupby.strategy.GroupByStrategySelector.<init>(GroupByStrategySelector.java:43)
>   while locating io.druid.query.groupby.strategy.GroupByStrategySelector
>     for the 1st parameter of 
> io.druid.query.groupby.GroupByQueryQueryToolChest.<init>(GroupByQueryQueryToolChest.java:104)
>   at 
> io.druid.guice.QueryToolChestModule.configure(QueryToolChestModule.java:95) 
> (via modules: com.google.inject.util.Modules$OverrideModule -> 
> com.google.inject.util.Modules$OverrideModule -> 
> io.druid.guice.QueryRunnerFactoryModule)
>   while locating io.druid.query.groupby.GroupByQueryQueryToolChest
>   while locating io.druid.query.QueryToolChest annotated with 
> @com.google.inject.multibindings.Element(setNa
> {code} 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to