[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-23445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16431994#comment-16431994
 ] 

Hudson commented on AMBARI-23445:
---------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Ambari-trunk-Commit #9023 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-Commit/9023/])
AMBARI-23445. Refactor metrics_alert to support multiple nameservices 
(6454655+adoroszlai: 
[https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ambari.git&a=commit&h=09c959dba7622d0428931e87262f35a580fa3c14])
* (edit) 
ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.0.6/HDFS/test_alert_metrics_deviation.py
* (edit) 
ambari-common/src/main/python/resource_management/libraries/functions/namenode_ha_utils.py
* (edit) 
ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HDFS/2.1.0.2.0/package/alerts/alert_metrics_deviation.py


> Refactor metrics_alert to support multiple nameservices
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-23445
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-23445
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.0
>            Reporter: Endre Major
>            Assignee: Endre Major
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 2.7.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The HDFS metrics based alerts defined in alert_metrics_deviation.py is 
> agnostic of federated Namenodes.
> Tasks:
> When federation is enabled we should add an alert instance per nameservice 
> for the HDFS metric based alerts.
> Currently, we track metrics based alerts for:
> RPC processing latency
> RPC queue latency
> NN Heap usage
> There are multiple alerts based on whether service port is enabled and also 
> different time windows. 
> For every alert type, there should be an instance of the alert per 
> nameservice.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to