[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16026837#comment-16026837
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARIA-149:
-------------------------------------

GitHub user tliron reopened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/138

    ARIA-149 Enhance operation configuration

    * Parse special "dependencies" configuration parameters as YAML and
      treat as Parameter models, allowing them full use of intrinsic
      functions, type coersions, and validations
    * Rename various functions that process "properties" to more generically
      process "parameters" (properties, inputs, attributes, arguments, etc.)
    * The "configuration" field in OperationTemplate and Operation models
      is now now a dict of Parameter models
    * Added "function" and "arguments" fields to Operation model to preserve
      user data (in "implementation" and "inputs") and to clearly demarcate
      orchestration data from user data
    * Some cleanup of parser code touched by this commit

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca 
ARIA-149-functions-in-operation-configuration

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/138.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #138
    
----
commit f6ee65a9eaa8eb252c4431152327635a43dff425
Author: Tal Liron <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-04-20T22:54:47Z

    ARIA-149 Enhance operation configuration
    
    * Parse special "dependencies" configuration parameters as YAML and
      treat as Parameter models, allowing them full use of intrinsic
      functions, type coersions, and validations
    * Rename various functions that process "properties" to more generically
      process "parameters" (properties, inputs, attributes, arguments, etc.)
    * The "configuration" field in OperationTemplate and Operation models
      is now now a dict of Parameter models
    * Added "function" and "arguments" fields to Operation model to preserve
      user data (in "implementation" and "inputs") and to clearly demarcate
      orchestration data from user data
    * Some cleanup of parser code touched by this commit

commit 888c5cd6f86a12e096a8ce040aedd0f62c5eac0e
Author: Tal Liron <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-05-24T19:54:07Z

    Fixes
    
    * Rename implementation/inputs to function/arguments in Task API
    * Rename "create_parameters" to "merge_parameter_values" and improve
    * Change workflow "function" back to "implementation"

----


> Support instrinsic functions in "dependencies" operation configuration
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARIA-149
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-149
>             Project: AriaTosca
>          Issue Type: Story
>            Reporter: Tal Liron
>            Assignee: Tal Liron
>
> There are a few issues here. First, the following YAML is totally broken;
> {code}
>               dependencies:
>                 - ssh.address > { get_attribute: virtual_ip.floating_ip }
> {code}
> The problem is that in YAML, due to the location of the ":", this gets parsed 
> as a dict where the key is {code}ssh.address > { get_attribute{code} and the 
> value is {code}virtual_ip.floating_ip }{code} which is not what we want at 
> all.
> The solution is to encase the whole value in quotes to enforce parsing as a 
> string:
> {code}
>               dependencies:
>                 - "ssh.address > { get_attribute: virtual_ip.floating_ip }"
> {code}
> Note that the one attractive solution is to to change this ">" format to a 
> real dict. So:
> {code}
>               dependencies:
>                 - { ssh.address: { get_attribute: virtual_ip.floating_ip } }
> {code}
> But this will break other TOSCA parsers that expect a string here, so no go. 
> :(



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to