[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16234843#comment-16234843
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARROW-1047:
---------------------------------------
BryanCutler commented on issue #1259: ARROW-1047: [Java] Add Generic Reader
Interface for Stream Format
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1259#issuecomment-341260009
@siddharthteotia the Java refactoring is the priority right now so I don't
want to hinder that, but I would like to get this in for the 0.8 release if
possible. I think changes to the ArrowReader should be mostly transparent,
although there might be conflicts with some of the tests I had to change. What
about if I try to cherry pick this into the java-vector-refactor branch? If it
doesn't go in cleanly then we can put it on hold until the refactor branch is
merge.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> [Java] Add generalized stream writer and reader interfaces that are decoupled
> from IO / message framing
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-1047
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1047
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Java - Vectors
> Reporter: Wes McKinney
> Assignee: Bryan Cutler
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> cc [~julienledem] [~elahrvivaz] [~nongli]
> The ArrowWriter
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/java/vector/src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/vector/file/ArrowWriter.java
> accepts a WriteableByteChannel where the stream is written
> It would be useful to be able to support other kinds of message framing and
> transport, like GRPC or HTTP. So rather than writing a complete Arrow stream
> as a single contiguous byte stream, the component messages (schema,
> dictionaries, and record batches) would be framed as separate messages in the
> underlying protocol.
> So if we were using ProtocolBuffers and gRPC as the underlying transport for
> the stream, we could encapsulate components of an Arrow stream in objects
> like:
> {code:language=protobuf}
> message ArrowMessagePB {
> required bytes serialized_data;
> }
> {code}
> If the transport supports zero copy, that is obviously better than
> serializing then parsing a protocol buffer.
> We should do this work in C++ as well to support more flexible stream
> transport.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
