[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16242687#comment-16242687
]
Li Jin commented on ARROW-1710:
-------------------------------
Seems we agree to remove non nullable vectors.
The next question is, what do people feel about dropping the "Nullable" prefix
in new vector classes? [~bryanc] brought this up initially.
I am +1 for dropping the "Nullable" prefix. It makes the code more concise.
> [Java] Decide what to do with non-nullable vectors in new vector class
> hierarchy
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-1710
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1710
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Java - Vectors
> Reporter: Li Jin
> Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> So far the consensus seems to be remove all non-nullable vectors.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
