[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16314990#comment-16314990
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARROW-1971:
---------------------------------------
robertnishihara commented on issue #1462: ARROW-1971: [Python] Add pandas
serialization to the default
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1462#issuecomment-355784133
Is that related to the choice of `_register_pandas_arrow_handlers` versus
`_register_custom_pandas_handlers`? Both of those can be used with both of the
custom numpy object array serializers, right?
EDIT: I think I see what you mean, yes, if we get rid of
`_register_pandas_arrow_handlers`, then the only difference would be the
handling of numpy object arrays.
This seems like the obvious thing to do unless there is some drawback with
`_register_custom_pandas_handlers`.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Add pandas serialization to the default
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-1971
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1971
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Python
> Affects Versions: 0.8.0
> Reporter: Devin Petersohn
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> {{pyarrow.register_default_serialization_handlers(context)}} does not include
> pandas serialization. We do not use the default Arrow context, so we are
> forced to call {{_register_pandas_arrow_handlers}} to register pandas
> correctly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
