[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16345498#comment-16345498
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARROW-2052:
---------------------------------------

pitrou commented on issue #1534: ARROW-2052: [C++ / Python] Rework OwnedRef, 
remove ScopedRef
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1534#issuecomment-361673351
 
 
   > There are already some JIRAs open about getting this cleaned up and 
well-documented for other developers, would you be interested in taking a look?
   
   Definitely, can you give me some pointers?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Unify OwnedRef and ScopedRef
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-2052
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2052
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Python
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
>            Reporter: Antoine Pitrou
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Currently {{OwnedRef}} and {{ScopedRef}} have similar semantics with small 
> differences. Furtheremore, the naming distinction isn't obvious.
> I propose to unify them as a single {{OwnedRef}} class with the following 
> characteristics:
> - doesn't take the GIL automatically
> - has a {{release()}} method that decrefs the pointer (and sets the internal 
> copy to NULL) before returning it
> - has a {{detach()}} method that returns the pointer (and sets the internal 
> copy to NULL) without decrefing it
> For the rare situations where an {{OwnedRef}} may be destroyed with the GIL 
> released, a {{OwnedRefNoGIL}} derived class would also be proposed (the 
> naming scheme follows Cython here).
> Opinions / comments?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to