[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16352638#comment-16352638
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-2059:
-------------------------------------
Thanks [~alphalfalfa] -- this suggests that we need to optimize the string
handling path (since strings are different in py2 vs py3 this explains why the
performance is a lot different). The write failure with the 100M table can't be
fixed at the moment (see ARROW-1907) -- as soon as we have R bindings for Arrow
(and thus the current iteration of the feather format code) we can fix.
> [Python] Possible performance regression in Feather read/write path
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-2059
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2059
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Python
> Reporter: Wes McKinney
> Assignee: Jingyuan Wang
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>
> See discussion in https://github.com/wesm/feather/issues/329. Needs to be
> investigated
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
