[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16569198#comment-16569198
]
Phillip Cloud edited comment on ARROW-2976 at 8/4/18 2:52 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
The implementation of {{get_library_dirs}} looks wrong, since it's looking for
Arrow C++ libraries in the pyarrow directory. This works fine for installed
versions, but It should be looking in something like {{sys.exec_prefix/lib}}
which would work for locally built pyarrow clones if the arrow C++ libraries
are installed in the same place as Python and it should continue to work for
installed versions as well.
was (Author: cpcloud):
The implementation of {{get_library_dirs}} looks wrong, since it's looking for
Arrow C++ libraries in the pyarrow directory. This works fine for installed
versions, but It should be looking in something like {{sys.exec_prefix/lib}}
which would work for locally built pyarrow clones if the arrow C++ libraries
are installed in the same place as Python.
> [Python] Directory in pyarrow.get_library_dirs() on Travis doesn't contain
> libarrow.so
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-2976
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2976
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Philipp Moritz
> Priority: Major
>
> Concerning the way pyarrow is built in `travis_script_python.sh`:
> The directory in pyarrow._get_library_dirs_() doesn't seem to contain
> libarrow.so.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
