[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-3776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16750606#comment-16750606
]
Paddy Horan commented on ARROW-3776:
------------------------------------
I was actually thinking we would need #3. Taking `value` as an example I would
be in favor of adding bounds checking to `value` and having a `value_unchecked`
that does no bounds checking and is unsafe.
I think that we need to provide the unsafe versions for maximum performance due
to Arrow often being described as a development platform rather than a front
end API. i.e. people will use it as the foundation of other higher level
libraries and so developers will want the option to avoid bounds checking for
performance reasons.
> [Rust] Mark methods that do not perform bounds checking as unsafe
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-3776
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-3776
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Rust
> Reporter: Paddy Horan
> Priority: Minor
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
