[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16765331#comment-16765331
 ] 

Eric Erhardt commented on ARROW-4502:
-------------------------------------

I think the first thing that needs to be done is update to the latest Google 
FlatBuffers code. I see they have [C# support for directly reading and writing 
to memory other than byte|https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/pull/4886] now. 
I will get this done today and send a PR. Does that need a separate Jira issue 
[~wesmckinn]? Or can I just reference this issue in the PR, and say the PR is 
"working towards ARROW-4502"?

 

[~cshutchinson] - Some thoughts about your reply above:
 # I don't think generating the code during the build is ideal. My main 
reasoning is for things like [Source 
Link|https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/library-guidance/sourcelink]
 to work correctly, it needs to point to source code contained in a repository. 
It also becomes a pain for people who are just browsing the code on GitHub or 
in a code editor. The arrow schema doesn't change that often does it, to the 
point where it needs to be re-generated on every build?
 # See my comment above - I will update the FlatBuffers code to the latest 
version, which appears to meet my needs.
 # Yes! I will include the benchmarks (using 
[BenchmarkDotNet|https://github.com/dotnet/benchmarkdotnet] a great tool). I 
will have to modify the current version a bit, since I am currently using a 
checked-in Arrow Stream file, which I assume we don't want to do.
 # I will give the changes a look and provide what feedback I can.

> [C#] Add support for zero-copy reads
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-4502
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4502
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C#
>            Reporter: Eric Erhardt
>            Assignee: Eric Erhardt
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: performance
>   Original Estimate: 48h
>  Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> In the Python (and C++) API, you can create a `RecordBatchStreamReader`, and 
> if you give it an `InputStream` that supports zero-copy reads, you can get 
> back `RecordBatch` objects without allocating new memory and copying all the 
> data.
> There is currently no way to read Arrow RecordBatch instances without 
> allocating new memory and copying all the data. We should enable this 
> scenario in the C# API.
>  
> My proposal is to create a new `class ArrowRecordBatchReader : IArrowReader`. 
> It's constructor will take a `ReadOnlyMemory<byte> data` parameter, and it 
> will be able to read `RecordBatch` instances just like the existing 
> `ArrowStreamReader`. As part of this new class, we will refactor any common 
> code out of `ArrowStreamReader` in order for the parsing logic to be shared, 
> where necessary.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to