[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16902118#comment-16902118
 ] 

Antoine Pitrou edited comment on ARROW-5559 at 8/7/19 2:46 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

Question: why is {{allow_64bit}} passed to 
{{RecordBatchWriter::WriteRecordBatch}} rather than at construction time?

Since that method is supposed to be overriden by implementors, it makes it a 
bit delicate to change its signature... Though better do it before 1.0.0.


was (Author: pitrou):
Question: why is {{allow_64bit}} passed to 
{{RecordBatchWriter::WriteRecordBatch}} rather than at construction time?

> [C++] Introduce IpcOptions struct object for better API-stability when adding 
> new options
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-5559
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5559
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Wes McKinney
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> Related to ARROW-2006. There are various IPC-related options like allowing 
> 64-bit lengths that might be better encapsulated in an options struct rather 
> than littered around different public APIs



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to