[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16902118#comment-16902118
]
Antoine Pitrou edited comment on ARROW-5559 at 8/7/19 2:46 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Question: why is {{allow_64bit}} passed to
{{RecordBatchWriter::WriteRecordBatch}} rather than at construction time?
Since that method is supposed to be overriden by implementors, it makes it a
bit delicate to change its signature... Though better do it before 1.0.0.
was (Author: pitrou):
Question: why is {{allow_64bit}} passed to
{{RecordBatchWriter::WriteRecordBatch}} rather than at construction time?
> [C++] Introduce IpcOptions struct object for better API-stability when adding
> new options
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-5559
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5559
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: C++
> Reporter: Wes McKinney
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> Related to ARROW-2006. There are various IPC-related options like allowing
> 64-bit lengths that might be better encapsulated in an options struct rather
> than littered around different public APIs
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)