[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17124012#comment-17124012
 ] 

Antoine Pitrou commented on ARROW-8950:
---------------------------------------

Would it be ok to be able to disable it in {{S3Options}}?

> [C++] Make head optional in s3fs
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-8950
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8950
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Remi Dettai
>            Assignee: Antoine Pitrou
>            Priority: Major
>
> When you open an input file with the f3fs, it issues a head request to S3 to 
> check if the file is present/authorized and get the size 
> (https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/f16f76ab7693ae085e82f4269a0a0bc23770bef9/cpp/src/arrow/filesystem/s3fs.cc#L407).
> This call comes with a non-neglictable cost:
>  * adds latency
>  * priced the same as a GET request by AWS
> I fail to see usecases where this call is really crucial:
>  * if the file is not present/authorized, failing at first read seems to have 
> mostly the same effect as failing on opening. I agree that it is kind of 
> "usual" for an _open_ call to fail eagerly, so to avoid surprises we could 
> add a flag indicating if we don't need to fail when running _OpenInputFile_ 
> on an inaccessible file.
>  * getting the size can be done on the first read, and could be mostly 
> avoided on caller side if the filesystem api provided read-from-end 
> capabilities (compatible with fs reads using _ios::end_ and on http 
> filesystems with _bytes=-xxx_). Worst case scenario the call to _head_ could 
> be done lazily when calling _getSize()._
> I agree that it makes things a bit more complex, and I understand that you 
> would not want to complexify the generic fs api because of blob storage 
> behavior. But obviously there are workloads where this has a significant 
> impact.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to