lidavidm commented on code in PR #16:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/pull/16#discussion_r942439274


##########
src/nanoarrow/nanoarrow.h:
##########
@@ -508,9 +512,31 @@ void ArrowArraySetValidityBitmap(struct ArrowArray* array, 
struct ArrowBitmap* b
 ArrowErrorCode ArrowArraySetBuffer(struct ArrowArray* array, int64_t i,
                                    struct ArrowBuffer* buffer);
 
+static inline struct ArrowBitmap* ArrowArrayValidityBitmap(struct ArrowArray* 
array);
+
+static inline struct ArrowBuffer* ArrowArrayBuffer(struct ArrowArray* array, 
int64_t i);
+
+static inline ArrowErrorCode ArrowArrayReserve(struct ArrowArray* array,
+                                               int64_t 
additional_size_elements);
+
+static inline ArrowErrorCode ArrowArrayResize(struct ArrowArray* array,
+                                              int64_t new_capacity_elements,
+                                              char shrink_to_fit);
+
+static inline ArrowErrorCode ArrowArrayAppendNull(struct ArrowArray* array, 
int64_t n);
+
+static inline ArrowErrorCode ArrowArrayAppendInt(struct ArrowArray* array, 
int64_t value);

Review Comment:
   I suppose I don't understand the intent here. Is the appender going to look 
at the type and cast appropriately? I would say, having type-specific appenders 
would let you skip that (albeit easily predicted) branch on every append.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to