sm-Fifteen opened a new issue, #36558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/36558

   ### Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, 
version, and platform.
   
   See https://github.com/pola-rs/polars/issues/9586#issuecomment-1625418583, 
where the issue was identified.
   
   ```py
   import pyarrow as pa
   import pyarrow.compute as pc
   
   from datetime import datetime
   
   pc.assume_timezone(pa.array([datetime(2020, 1, 1)]), '+00:00')
   ```
   
   > ArrowInvalid: Cannot locate timezone '+00:00': +00:00 not found in 
timezone database
   
   The [Arrow format 
specification](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/dd3670583d6fd8b95783f89f7b80c04588e16fb1/format/Schema.fbs#L319-L361)
 describes 3 timestamp formats: "naive date-time" (timezone string is null), 
"zoned date-time" (timezone string is from tzdb) and "offset date-time" 
(timezone string is a fixed RFC 3339 num-offset, so no Z). [The doc for 
assume_timezone](https://arrow.apache.org/docs/python/generated/pyarrow.compute.assume_timezone.html)
 makes no specific mention of it, but it cannot handle being passed an offset 
because it [only performs a lookup in 
tzdb](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/f8256bd625ac0b06238011fc13ea0249956e3859/cpp/src/arrow/compute/kernels/scalar_temporal_unary.cc#L116-L134)
 (via `LocateZone`) and doesn't try to parse the offset. That's despite 
documentation in other places saying that [offsets are completely fine and that 
"+00:00" should be considered as identical to 
"UTC"](https://arrow.apache.org/docs/cpp/api/datatype.html#classarrow_1
 _1_timestamp_type). Given all this, I would expect "+00:00" to be properly 
recognized as UTC, and "+01:00" to be recognized as a fixed offset.
   
   
   
   ### Component(s)
   
   Python


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to