bmwiedemann opened a new issue, #37276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/37276

   ### Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, 
version, and platform.
   
   While working on [reproducible builds](https://reproducible-builds.org/) for 
[openSUSE](https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Reproducible_Builds), I found that
   our `apache-arrow-12.0.1` package failed tests when run on a 1-core VM:
   
   Here is an extract from the log:
   ```
    
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/arrow-apache-arrow-12.0.1/cpp/src/arrow/csv/reader_test.cc:190:
 Failure
    Expected equality of these values:
      -1
      row.number
        Which is: 961
    
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/arrow-apache-arrow-12.0.1/cpp/src/arrow/csv/reader_test.cc:190:
 Failure
    Expected equality of these values:
      -1
      row.number
        Which is: 981
    
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/arrow-apache-arrow-12.0.1/cpp/src/arrow/csv/reader_test.cc:190:
 Failure
    Expected equality of these values:
      -1
      row.number
        Which is: 1001
    [  FAILED  ] StreamingReaderTests.InvalidRowsSkippedAsync (2 ms)
    [ RUN      ] StreamingReaderTests.BytesRead
    [       OK ] StreamingReaderTests.BytesRead (0 ms)
   
    [==========] 253 tests from 44 test suites ran. (978 ms total)
    [  PASSED  ] 252 tests.  
    [  FAILED  ] 1 test, listed below:
    [  FAILED  ] StreamingReaderTests.InvalidRowsSkippedAsync
   
     1 FAILED TEST
    ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/arrow-apache-arrow-12.0.1/cpp/build/src/arrow/csv
   
          Start 39: arrow-acero-plan-test
    39/78 Test #39: arrow-acero-plan-test ....................***Failed    1.78 
sec
    Running arrow-acero-plan-test, redirecting output into 
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/arrow-apache-arrow-12.0.1/cpp/build/build/test-logs/arrow-acero-plan-test.txt
 (attempt 1/1)
    Running main() from 
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/googletest-release-1.12.1/googletest/src/gtest_main.cc
   
   
   
    [ RUN      ] ExecPlanExecution.SegmentedAggregationWithMultiThreading
    
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/arrow-apache-arrow-12.0.1/cpp/src/arrow/acero/plan_test.cc:1615:
 Failure
    Value of: _st.IsNotImplemented()
      Actual: false
    Expected: true
    Expected 'DeclarationToExecBatches(std::move(plan))' to fail with 
NotImplemented, but got Invalid: Group-by aggregation with field 'i32' as both 
key and segment key
    
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/arrow-apache-arrow-12.0.1/cpp/src/arrow/acero/plan_test.cc:1615:
 Failure
    Value of: _st.ToString() 
    Expected: has substring "multi-threaded"
      Actual: "Invalid: Group-by aggregation with field 'i32' as both key and 
segment key"
    [  FAILED  ] ExecPlanExecution.SegmentedAggregationWithMultiThreading (0 ms)
   
   
    WARNING: Logging before InitGoogleLogging() is written to STDERR
    W20390831 20:38:32.254076 25012 source_node.cc:76] An input buffer was 
poorly aligned.  This could lead to crashes or poor performance on some 
hardware.  Please ensure that all Acero sources generate aligned buffers, or 
change the unaligned buffer handling configuration to silence this warning.
    [       OK ] ExecPlanExecution.UnalignedInput (0 ms)
    [----------] 50 tests from ExecPlanExecution (1584 ms total)
   
    [----------] Global test environment tear-down
    [==========] 60 tests from 4 test suites ran. (1716 ms total)
    [  PASSED  ] 59 tests.   
    [  FAILED  ] 1 test, listed below:
    [  FAILED  ] ExecPlanExecution.SegmentedAggregationWithMultiThreading
   
     1 FAILED TEST
    ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/arrow-apache-arrow-12.0.1/cpp/build/src/arrow/acero
   ```
   
   Steps to reproduce on Debian or openSUSE:
   ```bash
   osc co openSUSE:Factory/apache-arrow && cd $_
   osc build --vm-type=kvm --noservice -j1 standard
   ```
   
   ### Component(s)
   
   C++, Other


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to